Please help offset our server and hosting costs and keep our site running! Any amount is welcome.

Get a Daily Digest via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Latest Comments

  • HAHAHA, Jeff, I was wondering about that silence from the desperate one there fo... More...
  • Hi Russ! Thanks! I've had a reeely smart-arsed comment for him for about a week,... More...
  • HAHAHA, This one is a classic!!! Reports that the Mythbusters team were about to... More...
  • Leave off with the insults, A-hole. Just click on it: the site is unavailable. More...
  • HAHAHA, I didn't know about that Jeff. But then again I've not been on here very... More...
  • Good riddance, and don't let the cyber door hit you in the buttocks on the way o... More...
  • I guess you just couldn't take the embarrassment and humiliation any more. As yo... More...
  • HAHAHA, Good one Jeff! :D More...

Who's Online Now

We have 2544 guests online
christianbaby-ad
advert

Maldives coral island
Maldives coral island

One reason I am turned off by the Global Warming crowd is their instant science. Climatology has been around only 50 years and yet we are supposed to stop and turn the world on a dime because of something they have been studying for 5 minutes. Computer models? Computers run by GIGO. Garbage in, garbage out.

Here is a stunning example of why it pays to be a skeptic.

Friom Der Spiegel: “The Maldives have become a symbol of the dangers of global warming, amid fears the low-lying nation could disappear as a result of rising sea levels. But one team of scientists believes the truth is more complicated. The Maldives coral islands, they postulate, may be growing with the rising waters.”

So global warming is helpful?

Or maybe it is not global warming at all.

Or maybe we should just sit quietly and observe for a few years before coming up with a theory.

From Der Spiegel: “The geomorphologists compared old aerial photographs taken in World War II with current satellite images. To their surprise, they found that most of the atolls they were studying had either grown or remained unchanged in the last few decades, even though the sea level has already risen by 12 centimeters (about 5 inches).”

Hmm.

From Der Spiegel: “But will the islands also survive the future rise in sea level, which is likely to occur more rapidly than in the past? As global warming continues, the sea level could rise by more than half a centimeter a year. According to the IPCC, the world’s oceans could rise to levels more than half a meter higher than at the beginning of industrialization.”

Oh no. A foot a century! Poca will be flooded in 12,000 years. We must stop all human activity immediately.

Source

Comments  

 
# Gator 2010-07-25 14:54
From Der Spiegel: “The geomorphologists compared old aerial photographs taken in World War II with current satellite images. To their surprise, they found that most of the atolls they were studying had either grown or remained unchanged in the last few decades, even though the sea level has already risen by 12 centimeters (about 5 inches).”
Coral must float!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to Admin
 
 
# FrankS 2010-07-25 17:13
Watts Up With That published some photos back in 2009 from a study by Nils-Axel Morner showing that the Maldives had risen relative to the ocean.

Proof indeed that coral does float

Link here
wattsupwiththat.com/.../...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to Admin
 
 
# Jerry Matchett 2010-07-25 19:09
Corals do not float but grow as immense colonies in which new individuals grow an inverted conical skeleton on top of the dead skeletons of earlier corals. The resulting mass is geologically called coral limestone and bears the telltale shapes of the little creatures. Thus, over time, coral colonies do grow either outward with a level sea or upward if the sea level rises. A sinking sea level can kill off some of the highest corals but the survivors can still grow outward. In a rising sea level, the corals add to the mass of coral each generation and do increase in altitude. Corals grow best at a certain distance below the low tide line and they have had millions of years of evolution to perfect their own adaptation to changing conditions.
It is entirely unreasonable to think they could not adapt to changing sea level in the future no matter which way it goes.
The living part of the coral animal looks rather like an upside down jellyfish, the latter being their free swimming relative.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to Admin
 
 
# Bob D 2010-07-26 01:13
Very true. The following page is quite instructive when considering the Maldives corals.

hello-maldives.com/corals.htm

Notice that the growth rate is currently 5-28 mm/yr for the stony corals. The sea level rise rate is averaging about 2mm/yr at the moment, according to the Jason satellite data. So the corals can easily outgrow the sea level rise.

So what does it take to kill a reef? According to Webster, J.M. et al. (2004) a sea level rise of 35m in 500 years (70mm/yr), such as happened around Hawaii ca. 14,700 years ago, MAY have been enough to drown the reef there. Maybe.

What is intriguing is why the scientists declared themselves baffled. All this coral reef growth theory has been known since Darwin's time. The 12 cm rise since WWII equates to about 2mm/yr, which is easily within the growth rate of the corals.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to Admin
 
 
# Panic Induced Science 2010-07-26 03:26
Very true Jerry, the only thing they have had not encountered in millions of years of evolution is the panic induced hysteria of GIGO computer models of the alarmists that suggest the rise is going to be so rapid that the corals will drown. It is a good job the corals don't have ears.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to Admin
 
 
# Gator 2010-07-26 09:12
Sorry, guess JM and I should have prefaced our remarks with a "Warning, Sarcasm Ahead!" banner.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to Admin
 
 
# John Marshall 2010-07-26 04:20
At the time of the last ice age sea levels were 165 m lower than today. There was no Great Barrier Reef. The ice melted and sea levels rose as did the GBR which started growing as the land was flooded and continued to grow with sea level rise. Coral can easily contend with rising sea levels, indeed is is one way for it to survive. Coral cannot survive falling sea levels. It cannot live in free air as it rapidly dries out.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to Admin
 
 
# Jimmy Haigh 2010-07-26 06:20
This is what corals do. Unlike climate 'scientists' us geologists have known that this is what corals do for a couple of hundred years.

Corals have known what to do - i.e., react to ever changing sea levels - for hundreds of millions of years.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to Admin
 
 
# amirlach 2010-07-26 11:04
I thought Corals reproduced by releasing their young into the water not unlike plant spores? They float away and attach at a new site.

Unless the water rise was very drastic they would adapt with ease to any changes.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to Admin
 
 
# Nullius in Verba 2010-07-29 13:14 Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to Admin
 

Add comment

Avoid profanities/foul language. Stay on topic and PLAY NICE. Threats are not tolerated. Long links are shortened but still work. Emails not shown. PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to Admin' link.


Security code
Refresh