Despite all scientific evidence now denying the greenhouse
hypothesis, the greenhousers stand by their story. That story: global
temperatures will continue to rise in direct proportion to the amount
of CO2 released into the atmosphere and for many years after CO2
emissions stop altogether resulting mass famine, flooding, death, and
the Cubs winning the World Series.
Unfortunately for Al Gore, the past year saw almost every tenet,
speculation, and idea about greenhouse gasses and man-made global
warming fall to the scrutiny of science:
As I pointed out
on Planet Gore yesterday, the U.S. needs a real energy policy which
includes accessing all of the resources at our disposal in order to
increase domestic oil production. According to a new poll done by Rasmussen Reports, Americans wholeheartedly agree:
A
new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey — conducted before McCain
announced his intentions on the issue — finds that 67% of voters
believe that drilling should be allowed off the coasts of California,
Florida and other states. Only 18% disagree and 15% are undecided.
Conservative and moderate voters strongly support this approach, while
liberals are more evenly divided (46% of liberals favor drilling, 37%
oppose).
It’s about time that liberals like Al Gore come up with a new crisis. Global warming (climate change) is running out of steam.
Bob Unruh of WorldNetDaily reported that 31,000
U.S. scientists - 9,000 with doctorate degrees in atmospheric science,
climatology, Earth science, environment and other specialties - have
signed a petition rejecting global warming.
The list of scientists includes 9,021 Ph.D.s,
6,961 at the master’s level, 2,240 medical doctors and 12,850 carrying
a bachelor of science or equivalent academic degree.
Global warming assumes that human production of greenhouse gases is destroying the Earth’s climate.
Analysis The story is that the world
is heating up - fast. Prominent people at NASA warn us that unless we
change our carbon producing ways, civilisation as we know it will come
to an end. At the same time, there are new scientific studies showing
that the earth is in a 20 year long cooling period. Which view is
correct? Temperature data should be simple enough to record and
analyze. We all know how to read a thermometer - it is not rocket
science.
Previously
we looked at how US temperature data sets have been adjusted - with
more recent versions of historical data sets showing a steeper rise in
temperature than they used to. Here, we'll be looking at current NASA
data and why their temperature maps appear hot-red, even when others
are cool-blue.
One of the strangest things I’ve learned in the past year about the
US Historical Climatological Network is the propensity for placement of
weather stations at sewage treatment plants.
The reason of course has to do with putting a thermometer at a
facility that is staffed 7 days a week. That thermomter must be
manually read once a day and the readings transcribed into a logbook.
Waste Water Treatment Plants (WWTP’s) fit that requirement (as they
have an operator on duty, often 24/7) but they themselves are their own
mini islands of waste heat and humidity, especially in winter and
overnight. Yet, a significant portion of the US climate data comes from
these locations.
Some have grassy areas where a climate monitoring station could be
placed, such as the one in Morrison, IL, and you’d think they would
place it there, away from the sewage tanks. Unfortunately, no.
The Senate's leading
climate-change bill, while aiming to combat global warming by reducing
carbon dioxide in the air, actually poses "extraordinary perils" for
Americans and the economy, according to a new study from The Heritage Foundation.
The
study, produced by Heritage's Center for Data Analysis (CDA), forecasts
severe consequences—including crushing energy costs, millions of jobs
lost and falling household income—if Congress enacts the so-called
Lieberman-Warner bill.
What follows are 50 state-by-state breakouts of the impact the bill would have on jobs and the economy.
On May 18, 1980, the once bucolic ice-cream cone shape that defined
Mount St. Helens in Washington state disappeared in monstrous blast of
ash, rock, gas, and heat.
It was one of the most powerful
explosions ever witnessed by humans and the force of the blast leveled
hundreds of square miles of forestland, devastated wildlife and killed
over 50 people.
Almost three decades later, the effects of the
eruption are readily apparent to the thousands of visitors to the
observation points in the sprawling Mount St. Helens volcanic monument.
But
time has also muted the effects to some degree. Trees are growing back
in some areas, plants have poked up through the ash, animals move
through the devastated plains once again.