|
Written by Kevin, Prometheus
|
|
Wednesday, 12 November 2008 |
Rep. John Dingell
Now that the election is over there’s one House race left to watch: Dingell v. Waxman.
John Dingell is the Ann Arbor/Detroit Representative who chairs the
Energy and Commerce Committee. E&C is the key House committee of
jurisdiction for climate policy and Dingell has been unabashed in his
reluctance to move climate policy forward. Considering the aggressive
moves by other Congressional Dems – particularly Bingaman, Boxer and
Markey — on trying to move the policy conversation forward within the
Democratic caucus in advance of January 2009, Dingell has been the bottleneck to movement.
Now, the always-aggressive Henry Waxman, #2 on the E&C committee, has started a push to wrest the gavel
from Dingell. The differences in philosophy and approach between the
two men are quite clear, especially on climate. Dingell has been
upfront about protecting the auto industry at all costs and being
reluctant on carbon regulations (see for example), while Waxman is clearly itching to move forward on carbon caps.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Rachel Marsden, Town Hall
|
|
Wednesday, 12 November 2008 |
Last week, radio king Rush Limbaugh riffed on the idea of “the
haughty John Kerry” being appointed Secretary of State in an Obama
administration, traveling the globe and stepping in it wherever he
went. Not a bad choice, but if we’re going to try getting our money’s
worth in entertainment over the next four years – given that we’ll be
paying top dollar – how about Al Gore for the job?
Forget any sort of environmental leadership position that would
limit him to America – The Goracle simply cannot be contained. Within
mere days of the Obama win, Gore exploded like Chernobyl all over the
op-ed pages of the New York Times:
“The inspiring and transformative choice by the American people
to elect Barack Obama as our 44th president lays the foundation for
another fateful choice that he — and we — must make this January to
begin an emergency rescue of human civilization from the imminent and
rapidly growing threat posed by the climate crisis.”
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Chris Horner, Planet Gore
|
|
Wednesday, 12 November 2008 |
If ever there were two items fairly capturing much of the theme of Red Hot Lies — cruising up the charts nicely here in its first few days off the press, thanks to all — these are the two.
First,
establishment scientists attack heretics, then refuse to release the
data they claim supports their alleged debunking of what, in this case,
increasingly appears to be a fatal flaw in the alarmist thesis: the
alleged “fingerprint” of greenhouse warming continues to not exist.
As I detail in RHL,
the global warming industry have a long and unhappy history of making
claims they apparently cannot back up and, when challenged, clinging to
their data like grim death, claiming it was lost, apparently fabricating data, having journals publish helpful conclusions without ever asking to see the numbers, and so on. When the data are released, things don’t end well for the alarmists — as the Hockey Team’s original and now latest flailing bears out.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Anita Weier, Capital Times
|
|
Tuesday, 11 November 2008 |
A coal-fired plant like this was soundly rejected based on fears, not facts
State panel rejects proposed coal-fired power plant
The state Public Service Commission on
Tuesday unanimously rejected a proposed $1.3 billion 300-megawatt
mostly coal-fired power plant proposed by Wisconsin Power &
Light at Cassville.
In justifying their decision, commissioners
cited the cost, inefficiency and carbon dioxide emissions of the
proposed plant.
Rob Crain, a spokesman for WPL and its parent
company Alliant Energy, said the commission's written decision will
be reviewed, but an appeal is unlikely.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Julie Walsh, CEI
|
|
Tuesday, 11 November 2008 |
Why bother getting elected officials’ votes when you can accomplish your purposes by presidential fiat?
An article in yesterday’s Washington Post reveals just what the future will look like under the new president.
The president-elect has said, for example, that he
intends to quickly reverse the Bush administration’s decision last
December to deny California the authority to regulate carbon dioxide
emissions from automobiles…California had sought permission from the
[2] Environmental Protection Agency
to require that greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles be cut by 30
percent between 2009 and 2016, effectively mandating that cars achieve
a fuel economy standard of at least 36 miles per gallon within eight
years. Seventeen other states had promised to adopt California’s rules,
representing in total 45 percent of the nation’s automobile market.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by William Yeatman, The Detroit News
|
|
Tuesday, 11 November 2008 |
Gov. Jennifer Granholm
Gov. Jennifer Granholm has been drinking the "green jobs" Kool-aid,
recently announcing that she is creating an energy department and
naming an energy czar to pursue "alternative" energy and "create
thousands of jobs." Yet in these times of economic distress, the
governor's priorities are misplaced.
Environmental protection
comes at a price -- after all, someone has to pay to keep air and water
clean. However, politicians like Granholm claim that clever government
policies can result in environmental protections that simultaneously
grow the economy.
If something sounds too good to be true, it
is. Environmental protection still comes at a price, and Granholm's
green jobs initiative threatens Michigan's ailing economy.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|