|
Written by Henry Payne, National Review online
|
|
|
| on Sep 12, 2008, 01:46 PM E.S.T.
|
Top NASA climatologist James Hansen endorses eco-vandalism.
Prominent NASA climatologist James Hansen, a
close ally of global-warming activist Al Gore and one of the world’s
leading scientific voices warning of a global climate crisis, has
endorsed eco-vandalism.
Hansen’s controversial turn stems from
testimony he gave this month in a London criminal trial against
Greenpeace supporters who were accused of defacing — at a cost of
$60,000 in property damage — Kingsnorth, an English coal
plant. Hansen testified in support of the defense’s assertion that the
Greenpeace members had a “lawful excuse” because they were acting to
protect property around the world “in immediate need of protection”
from the impacts of global warming — caused in part, they allege, by
coal burning.
By crossing the line to the side of destructive violence, Hansen
— often hailed as the “the world’s leading climate scientist” by green
organizations and praised by Time magazine as one of the
world’s “100 Most Influential People” — has seriously damaged the
credibility of a movement that has struggled to separate its
apocalyptic rhetoric from more extreme environmentalists who demand
violent action to match that rhetoric.
|
|
|
|
Written by Wall Street Journal
|
|
|
| on Sep 12, 2008, 01:33 PM E.S.T.
|
[H/T to Gore Lied] Never underestimate a politician's ability to wriggle
out of a clear choice. So it is with the so-called "Gang of 10" energy
plan that is becoming the political escape hatch for Members of
Congress, especially those "green Democrats" who suddenly want to
appear to favor more oil and gas drilling.
The Gang of 10 compromise was released before the
August recess by five Senate Republicans and five Democrats. The plan
would at least allow drilling offshore of four states -- Georgia,
Virginia and the Carolinas -- and in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. It
would also allow modern seismic surveillance, which would show how much
oil and gas is really out there. Louisiana Democrat Mary Landrieu, who
is undeniably pro-drilling, tells us this compromise is about as much
as the current Congress will do and would galvanize other states to
follow when they see the financial windfall.
|
|
|
|
Written by The Daily Bayonet
|
|
|
| on Sep 11, 2008, 05:35 PM E.S.T.
|
CCF Note: This weekly feature from The Daily Bayonet is becoming a regular staple among many blogs and for good reason: It's informative, well-written, and funny. Be sure to let Mr. Bayonet what you think of his efforts as I'm sure he'd appreciate it. Enjoy!
* * * * *
I have to publish this one day early as
I will be away for the weekend, starting tomorrow. I'm sure you'll
cope with the sudden rush of excitement at getting your denier noses
into the denial trough a whole day early.
As usual, lots to cover
this week. Before I get going, here's a little blog note; the number
of searches from both the USA and Canada for 'global warming hoax' and
'climate change hoax' have spiked since the election call in Canada and
the appointment of Sarah Palin to the McCain ticket in the US.
Interesting, no?
|
|
|
|
Written by Baxter Bulletin
|
|
|
| on Sep 11, 2008, 03:14 PM E.S.T.
|
The European Union has already accepted the Kyoto Protocol, and we are being pressured to join. In 1997, our Senate votes 95-0 to oppose the treaty. Now the presidential candidates are talking global warming. I doubt that a Democratic Congress will continue to resist.
Charles Krauthammer, in a recent column, quoted the Czech president, "that the ambitious, arrogant, unscrupulous ideology of environmentalism is the largest threat to freedom, democracy, the economy and prosperity."
The first phase of Kyoto's emission reduction requirements is estimated to cost $716 billion. You guessed it, two-thirds to fall on the U.S. supposedly because we're the world's worst polluter. China, India, South Korea and Mexico will not be required to join. Even with that estimated cost, what would it achieve? Even the U.N. computer formula says global temperature by 2050 would be equivalent to .05 degrees centigrade, or 1/20th of a degree. How insane is that?
Let's look at the facts about warming. Environmentalists and the so-called intelligentsia want you to believe the 100s were the hottest ever. Wrong. The hottest in the past century was actually the years between 1920 and 1940.
|
|
|
|
Written by Warren Miller, Beacon
|
|
|
| on Sep 11, 2008, 02:09 PM E.S.T.
|
It is the last week of August, a good morning for a steaming hot bowl
of oatmeal. The rain is pouring down at a 45-degree angle, driven by
30-mile-an-hour winds. It is out of the east and the waves crashing
against our boat at the dock are getting bigger with each passing hour.
This is summer?
The weather woman last night said, “The temperature will drop to 38
degrees in the foothills and the snow level is already down to 3,500
feet.”
In conversation with a friend from Vail today he said, “Last week Vail
got dumped on by six inches of snow that stuck around for almost a
week.” All of this weird weather is because Al Gore narrated a movie
about global warming and he got a Nobel Prize in Norway for his
forecast of a hot planet. In his effort to cut down on worldwide
pollution he even flew to Norway in his private jet from his 22-bedroom
house.
|
|
|
|
Written by Klockarman, Gore Lied
|
|
|
| on Sep 11, 2008, 01:45 PM E.S.T.
|
DEAD ZONES are hypoxic (low-oxygen) areas in the world's oceans
The Oregonian has been reporting regularly for the past few
years on a phenomenon off of the Oregon Coast referred to as "dead
zones". Dead zones are areas of the ocean where oxygen levels in the
water have sunk to levels that will not sustain ocean life. Fish can
apparently swim clear, but crabs, starfish, and other less mobile sea
life suffocate from lack of oxygen.
Scientists did not have any clear evidence of what was causing the
dead zones, and they were clearly alarmed by the situation. The
Oregonian was alarmed too. Therefore the scientists and the journalists
resorted to the usual tactic of blaming any unexplained environmental
malady on human-induced causes - in this case (as in so many others) it
was anthropogenic global warming.
July 6, 2006, The Oregonian reported:
The ocean is behaving strangely along the west coast in the
latest of a string of unusual years, with scientists reporting crashing
bird populations off California for the second consecutive year and
hiccups in the nutrients that feed marine life off Oregon.
|
|
|
|