|
Written by Bjorn Lomborg, The Nation
|
|
Friday, 27 June 2008 |
Whatever the outcome of the United States' presidential election, climate-change policy will be transformed.
Both
candidates have placed great importance on global warming. Republican
John McCain believes that it presents "a test of foresight, of
political courage, and of the unselfish concern that one generation
owes to the next", while Democrat Barack Obama calls it "one of the
greatest moral challenges of our generation".
It remains
far from clear, however, whether the shift in rhetoric and policy will
move the planet any closer to embracing the best response. Both McCain
and Obama could leave future generations lumbered with the costs of
major cuts in carbon emissions - without major cuts in temperatures.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Claudia Cattaneo, Financial Post
|
|
Wednesday, 25 June 2008 |
Big-city U. S.
mayors and presidential hopeful Barack Obama, who joined the parade
this week of ill-informed, U. S. anti-oil sands policies, should be
careful what they wish for.
While the aim is undoubtedly to
pander to the electorate in an election year charged with oil and
climate-change debate, what they are stoking is an increasingly angry
Canadian energy industry that is seriously looking at non-U. S. markets
for its oil.
Here's what Rick George, chief executive of Suncor
Energy Inc., Canada's largest single oil sands producer, said this
week, reflecting rising frustration with the wave of American anti-oil
sands policies:
"We are down to very limited amounts of spare
capacity," he said. "Mexico is in very steep decline. The North Sea is
in decline. Venezuela is likely to slip from here. There are problems
in Nigeria, Russia. The world will absorb this oil one way or the
other. If the U. S. doesn't take it, then we will develop other
markets."
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Pittsburgh Tribune Review Editorial
|
|
Wednesday, 25 June 2008 |
|
There's yet more evidence that global warming alarmists are scared to
death that the jig is up on their orchestrated efforts to foist entire
landfills of junk science on a very gullible public.
James Hansen is director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space
Studies (GISS). He's also considered the "intellectual" underpinning
for just about every anti-global warming campaign of every eco-nut out
there. Pittsburgh's Heinz Endowments is a big fan. So, too, is Ozone Al
Gore.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Thomas Lifson, American Thinker
|
|
Wednesday, 18 June 2008 |
|
The
morality play on offer from greenies and their media buddies holds that
"we can't drill our way" to cheaper oil prices, but "conservation" and
"new technologies" for "alternative energy" are the answer.
Thus,
I am thankful to Al Gore for proving that even in a high profile
demonstration project these "solutions" won't work. The Tennessee
Center for Policy Research reports that
Gore's home in Nashville has increased its energy usage by 10% in the
past year. This is in the face of proudly-announced (and expensive)
energy-saving steps. Stop the ACLU cites the Soros-Funded Think Progress site for information:
Gore's
family has taken numerous steps to reduce the carbon footprint of their
private residence, including signing up for 100 percent green power
through Green Power Switch, installing solar panels, and using compact
fluorescent bulbs and other energy saving technology.
Now
that Gore has proven his measures are ineffective, it is time to drill
offshore, ANWR, mine coal and oil-bearing rock, and build nuclear power
plants on an expedited basis. Source
|
|
|
Written by Lynn Woolley, HumanEvents
|
|
Wednesday, 18 June 2008 |
|
The Democrats have been doing some seriously stupid things lately.
And yet, if the polls and pundits are to be believed, they are going to
kick the Republicans’ butts in November. If that happens, get ready
for some big-time buyer’s remorse.
The Democratic Party has been
shifting left for years and now has reached the Insanity Zone. Some of
the things they’re doing or will do if they control all branches of
government give new meaning to the word “stupid.”
Start with
the Lieberman-Warner bill a.k.a. America’s Climate Security Act. At a
time when gasoline prices are spiraling past $4 a gallon, it’s hard to
understand a party that supports a plan that will make things worse.
Much worse.
This is the “cap and trade” legislation that would
award to the government the exclusive right to decide who could emit
carbon dioxide and how much to charge (tax) them for it. According to
Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), Lieberman-Warner would result in higher
prices at the pump in addition to raising taxes on Americans by more
than $1 trillion over a decade. The Federal Energy Information
Administration estimates that we’d see a 9.5% drop in manufacturing
output. Low income Americans who spend more of their income on energy
will pay through the nose.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY
|
|
Thursday, 12 June 2008 |
|
The Illinois Democrat made those remarks when asked by CNBC's Erin
Burnett what the Democratic energy agenda would be. Perhaps it was a
Freudian slip, but it just happens to be the truth — something 57% of
the American people agree with, according to a new Gallup poll.
While attacking GOP presidential nominee John McCain for "trying to
drill our way out of the situation," Emanuel told CNBC: "I think you
have to have both — obviously more production — but also to start to
invest, which has not happened, in (energy) alternatives as well."
So do we. This is pretty much what congressional Republicans and President Bush have been saying all along.
We need to develop all of our domestic energy resources, none to the
exclusion of any other source — nuclear, clean coal, oil, natural gas,
wind, solar, heck, maybe even switch grass.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|