NPR has an interesting article
on global warming... or cooling? The Mystery of Global Warming's
Missing Heat. James Hansen and Al Gore must be so disappointed. NASA is
spending around 20 million dollars a year to deploy and monitor 3000
robot buoys around the worlds oceans and the data coming in doesn't
support their theory on global warming, in fact it turns out the world
has cooled slightly in the last five years.
It's surprising the
mainstream media hasn't picked up on this, you would think the fact
that the earth is cooling would be front page news.
Wondering what we get for 20 mil per year? Here is a brief description from the Argo home page.
A proposed solution to reverse the effects of global warming by
spraying sulfate particles into Earth's stratosphere could make matters
much worse, climate researchers said on Thursday.
They said trying to cool off the planet by creating a kind of
artificial sun block would delay the recovery of the Antarctic ozone
hole by 30 to 70 years and create a new loss of Earth's protective
ozone layer over the Arctic.
"What our study shows is if you actually put a lot of sulfur into
the atmosphere we get a larger ozone depletion than we had before,"
said Simone Tilmes of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in
Boulder, Colorado, whose research appears in the journal Science.
In the summer of 2006 I went to see Congressman Rahm Emanuel,
who was running the Democrats' successful effort to regain control of
the House of Representatives. I had been reading a great deal about
global warming in the mainstream press ("Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid"
warned Time). So I asked Emanuel, how are the environment and global
warming playing out there in the heartland? Is it stirring voters? No,
he replied. In the 2006 congressional elections global warming was
virtually a nonissue, he said, a low-priority item way behind the war
and the economy and old staples like education and health care. Global
warming is an issue for the elites, he said, not for the average voter.
That's still true. The mainstream media continues to write urgently about global warming. Last month NEWSWEEK asked on its cover which candidate will be the most green. On Sunday the New York Times Magazine produced a special issue
on how to reduce your carbon footprint-from changing your light bulbs
to walking more to eating "slow food." Any reader of old-line
mainstream media-the traditional news source of the upper middle
class-would think that the country is rallying to a crisis.
Climate Change:
A former NASA astronaut says the same solar phenomenon that doomed
Napoleon's army may soon stop Al Gore's march to glory cold. Prepare
for the big chill.
Napoleon's retreat from Moscow is a legendary military disaster.
While historians and military buffs note the toll the Russian winter
took on La Grande Armee, few if any appreciate the role solar activity,
or the lack of it, played in one of the great military reversals in
history.
Geophysicist Phil Chapman, the first Australian to become a NASA
astronaut, and who served as mission specialist on the Apollo 14 lunar
mission, writes in the Down Under newspaper the Australian that "the
rout of Napoleon's Grand Army from Moscow was at least partly due to
the lack of sunspots."
This is more than a historical footnote. The same pattern of solar activity that doomed Napoleon is occurring as we speak.
The "green levy" on motorists
announced in Alistair Darling's first Budget will double car tax
revenue to £4 billion but reduce vehicle emissions by less than one per
cent, Treasury figures have showed.
The Chancellor announced a significant increase in car tax in March.
This
will result in the owners of family cars, estates and people carriers
paying hundreds of pounds a year more to use the roads.
As
food prices soar, and rationing of such things as rice begin, America's
media are finally starting to wake up to the inconvenient truth that
ethanol is not the energy panacea folks like Nobel Laureate Al Gore proclaim.
Leading
the charge is conservative talk radio host Glenn Beck (pictured), who invited the
Competitive Enterprise Institute's Iain Murray on his program Tuesday
to discuss the looming crisis.
One of the most extensive oil deposits in the world—the huge Bakken Formation—underlies North Dakota and Saskatchewan. The Bakken holds up to 500 billion barrels of oil, double the proven reserves of Saudi Arabia. But it lies in thin, shallow shale formations that are hard to drill and don’t flow readily. Is the Bakken America’s energy independence; a dire threat of global overheating; or just expensive holes in the ground?
In 1995, the U.S. Geological Survey said it expected to recover only 151 million of the Bakken’s billions of barrels, using then-available technology. This month, however, USGS announced the Bakken could now yield 28 times that much oil, up to 4.3 billion barrels, thanks to higher oil prices and two new technologies: computer-guided horizontal drilling, and high-pressure rock fracturing. Will another dozen years of high-tech add another 4 billion barrels of recoverable Bakken oil? Will biotech bacteria help us harvest the oil as natural gas?
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (pictured) wants to ‘abolish’ carbon usage and sees a direct comparison to the end of slavery.
According to Kennedy, “industry and government warnings” about avoiding “economic ruin” should not be heeded because abolishing slavery
did not cripple the British economy as was predicted “Instead of
collapsing, as slavery’s proponents had predicted, Britain’s economy
accelerated,” he argued. Here's how he put it:
“Lord Puttnam recalled that precisely 200 years ago Parliament heard
identical caveats during the debate over abolition of the slave trade.
At that time slave commerce represented one-fourth of Britain’s G.D.P.
and provided its primary source of cheap, abundant energy. Vested
interests warned that financial apocalypse would succeed its
prohibition,” wrote Kennedy in a “manifesto” to the next American
president in Vanity Fair’s “Green” issue.
[Emphasis added] The government's National Climate Data Center in its
report on US climate for March states, "the average temperature for the
contiguous U.S. was near average (ranking the 63rd warmest)". What are
they trying to tell us?
If you have any question about the degree of objectivity government
scientists have in trying to support very costly emission control
regulations that will have no discernible impact on climate, your
doubts have just been confirmed in print.
Government
scientists at the National Climate Data Center as supposed to be
providing unbiased, objective information about climate and climate
change. Yet their annual budget is dependent upon the degree of
interest that climate holds with the public. And there's nothing like a
scare-mongering scam to get that interest worked into a frenzy. Bottom
line: The more the NCDC can support the Algorean (credit for the term
goes to Paul Driessen) theory of human-caused climate catastrophy, the
higher the annual budget for NCDC operations.
Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (pictured) says he is "light green" on the
environment and is skeptical that humans are causing global warming.
Bush,
whose two terms ended in 2007, also said Wednesday that he "can't
imagine" running for national office and isn't interested in being Sen.
John McCain's running mate.
The younger brother of President
George W. Bush made the comments during an address to several hundred
business people meeting in a hotel ballroom. Earlier in the day, he met
with other directors of Dallas-based Tenet Healthcare Corp., the
hospital chain whose board he joined last year.
In what's become Earth Month, the media press on as though it's Public Issue No. 1.
If
you’re not too concerned about global warming, you’re probably a
regular American. If you think, however, that it’s on par with World
War II as a threat to the nation, you’re the managing editor of Time
magazine.