|
Written by The Chilling Effect
|
|
|
| on Sep 24, 2008, 05:05 PM E.S.T.
|
Sen. Joe Biden flatly stated that coal is killing you, just months after Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said it’s making us sick. So what about it? Is coal killing us?
We doubt anyone would suggest huffing coal particulates for kicks
and giggles, and if they did, it would be best not to heed their call.
But here’s something that Senators Biden and Reid may have missed,
probably because they are not on the Senate committee overseeing the Department of Health and Human Services.
|
|
|
|
Written by Ted Alvarez, Backpacker Blogs
|
|
|
| on Sep 24, 2008, 03:16 PM E.S.T.
|
Taking a page from the Bambi's-mother-getting-shot playbook of
manipulative animation, advertising agency McCann commissioned a
global-warming PSA for Portugal's nature and conservation association,
Quercus. The spot features cute animals rendered with high-quality
computer animation, all preparing to off themselves because of global
warming. You might want to get out the hankie for this one:
|
|
|
|
Written by Jerome J. Schmitt, American Thinker
|
|
|
| on Sep 24, 2008, 02:56 PM E.S.T.
|
Outsiders familiar with the
proper workings of science have long known that modern Climate Science
is dysfunctional. Now a prominent insider, MIT Meteorology Professor
Richard S. Lindzen, confirms
how Al Gore and his minions used Stalinist tactics to subvert, suborn
and corrupt a whole branch of science, citing chapter and verse in his report entitled "Climate Science: Is it currently designed to answer questions?" His answer: A resounding "NO!"
Detailing the corruption, he names a series of names. Until reading this I did not know that
"For
example, the primary spokesman for the American Meteorological Society
in Washington is Anthony Socci who is neither an elected official of
the AMS nor a contributor to climate science. Rather, he is a former
staffer for Al Gore." Page 5
|
|
|
|
Written by Skeptics Global Warming
|
|
|
| on Sep 24, 2008, 02:45 PM E.S.T.
|
I recently read an article over at the Duke Chronicle
that discussed the link between global warming and hurricanes and, more
importantly, the inability to link global warming and hurricanes. The
article says that Hurricane Ike reignited the debate of whether or not
a link exists between hurricanes and climate change. Having done my
own study on the connection between tropical systems and temperature, I can tell you that I didn’t see any connection. Activists, however, see things differently. Al Gore recently tried to link the two, citing higher temperatures that cause more ocean water to evaporate, leading to stronger storms.
I’ve written many posts in the past that outlined the debate over hurricanes and global warming. From insurance rates going up for those living along the coast because of global warming to genuine debates
over the impact of climate change on tropical storms. It comes as no
surprise to skeptics of climate change that no one really knows whether
or not hurricanes and global warming can be linked. It’s a big
guessing game as computer models just don’t possess the ability to
model every single element of the atmosphere and derive accurate
results.
|
|
|
|
Written by The Daily Bayonet
|
|
|
| on Sep 24, 2008, 02:42 PM E.S.T.
|
Aged hippy and professional agitator David Suzuki was in Alberta yesterday.
He only goes to Alberta to shout at them for being successful; the
province doggedly refuses to drink the AGW kool-aid and continues to
enjoy booming economic times.
Suzuki would far rather Alberta
decimate its economy by closing up the tar sands and clubbing its
citizens into green submission with carbon taxes.
The worst
part of Suzuki's latest rant was his rank hypocrisy over the green
shift. He said this of PM Harper's dismissal of the Liberal policy:
“You don’t dismiss a major proposal like the carbon tax and just say,
‘That’s crazy.’ What kind of discussion is that? At least it should be
on the table so the public can begin to understand what it is.”
|
|
|
|
Written by Phil Kerpen, National Review Online
|
|
|
| on Sep 24, 2008, 02:38 PM E.S.T.
|
With the clock ticking down to what some are
calling “Energy Freedom Day” — October 1, 2008, when the congressional
bans on offshore oil drilling and onshore oil-shale development are set
to expire — anti-drilling Democrats have backed down from a high-stakes
stand-off that could have caused a government shutdown and will now
result in the complete demise of the drilling bans. This is a stunning
victory for grassroots activists over environmental special interests
and business-as-usual in Washington. If not derailed, it also will be
great news for all American consumers.
Here’s a behind-the-scenes look at how the pro-drilling victory transpired.
|
|
|
|
Written by Clifford Krauss, Green Inc., NY Times
|
|
|
| on Sep 24, 2008, 02:34 PM E.S.T.
|
Senator Harry Reid
Wind and solar power companies had something to celebrate on Tuesday when the Senate overwhelmingly passed
major tax legislation that would extends $17 billion in renewable
energy tax incentives that otherwise expire on December 31. Democrats
and Republicans on Capitol Hill say they want to support wind and
solar, and so does the White House.
But the legislative process works in strange and mysterious ways
sometimes, and final enactment is not assured before Congress adjourns
in the coming days. House Democrats have reservations about the tax
bill, saying they don’t want to add to the national debt, so the big
bill may be in jeopardy.
If an agreement is not worked out on the tax bill, House members
could extend the tax credits for wind and solar anyway in a separate
bill, and then go back on the campaign trail and say they supported
clean energy. But unless the Senate also breaks out the energy
provisions in a separate bill, that would not be enough.
|
|
|
|
Written by Michael Schirber, LiveScience
|
|
|
| on Sep 24, 2008, 02:30 PM E.S.T.
|
Wind energy might be the simplest renewable energy to understand.
Yet there are misconceptions about what makes the wind industry turn.
The United States now has nearly 17,000 megawatts of wind power
installed, which can supply about 1.2 percent of the nation's demand
for electricity, according to a recent report from the Department of
Energy (DOE).
With these numbers projected to grow in the coming years, it might
be good to be aware of a few myths that are blowing in the wind.
1. Wind is cheap
No one owns the wind, so it might seem like wind energy should cost
less than other technologies that require costly fuel, such as coal or
natural gas, to operate.
|
|
|
|
Written by Dan Gainor, Business and Media
|
|
|
| on Sep 24, 2008, 01:55 PM E.S.T.
|
With the “meltdown” on Wall Street, it looks like global warming is striking the financial markets.
Don’t laugh. It must have gone somewhere because it’s not doing as the left and the media had warned. Just a few months ago, supposedly responsible journalists were telling us that the Arctic could be ice free this summer because of the dreaded realties of warming.
There are 1.74 million reasons why that didn’t happen. That’s how many square miles of ice are still standing after Arctic ice hit its low point for the season.
On July 28, NBC’s Anne Thompson was the one on ice patrol. “But this summer, some scientists say that ice could retreat so dramatically that open water covers the North Pole, so much so that you could sail across it.”
|
|
|
| on Sep 24, 2008, 01:40 PM E.S.T.
|
People who
believe they have the greenest lifestyles can be seen as some of the
main culprits behind global warming, says a team of researchers, who
claim that many ideas about sustainable living are a myth, The Guardian newspaper in Britain reported Wednesday.
According to the researchers, said the newspaper, people who regularly
recycle rubbish and save energy at home are also the most likely to
take frequent long-haul flights abroad. The carbon emissions from such
flights can swamp the green savings made at home, the researchers
claim.
Stewart Barr, of Exeter University, who led the
research, said: "Green living is largely something of a myth. There is
this middle class environmentalism where being green is part of the
desired image. But another part of the desired image is to fly off
skiing twice a year. And the carbon savings they make by not driving
their kids to school will be obliterated by the pollution from their
flights."
|
|
|
|
Written by Thomas Richard, Climate Change Fraud
|
|
|
| on Sep 24, 2008, 01:11 PM E.S.T.
|
If you’re a young person, I believe we’ve reached a point of civil disobedience.
—Al Gore, at the Sept. 24, 2008, Clinton Global Initiative, saying that we are at a point in our world's history where today's youth need to take coal plants down. Al Gore won the Nobel Peace Prize.
|
|
|
|
Written by Pat Sangimino, Wichita Business Journal
|
|
|
| on Sep 24, 2008, 12:38 PM E.S.T.
|
A Washington D.C. economist says global warming is not America’s most pressing concern in these economically challenged times.
“We have to look at the big picture,” says Margo Thorning [pictured], a senior
vice president and chief economist with the American Council for
Capital Formation. “... I don’t think global warming is our worst
problem by far.”
Thorning says electricity is essential for emerging countries
working their way out of poverty. And her data shows the increased bulk
of carbon dioxide emitted into the environment comes from places like
China, India and Africa.
“Global warming is an issue, but to me, it’s less important an issue
than alleviating the need for electricity that people have,” Thorning
says. “I am interested in people living longer, happier, healthier
lives. They need electricity. ... They cannot claw their way out of
poverty and abject misery without electricity.”
|
|
|
|