|
Written by AAP
|
|
Thursday, 07 August 2008 |
|
Climate change represents the biggest opportunity
for global giant General Electric over the coming decades, the
company's Australian and New Zealand chief executive Steve Sargent says.
"For us, we look at this (climate change) as
the biggest business opportunity of the century," Mr Sargent told an
American Chamber of Commerce in Australia lunch in Melbourne.
GE provides a range of services and products
to the energy, oil and gas and water-treatment sectors, and
manufactures jet engines and locomotives.
Climate change is a hot topic among business
as the federal government prepares for the introduction of an emissions
trading scheme (ETS) in 2010 to curb the growth of globally warming
greenhouse gases.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Steven Milloy, foxnews.com
|
|
Thursday, 07 August 2008 |
|
Former New York Times environmental reporter Phil Shabecoff is so green he even recycles debunked health scares.
Shabecoff’s
new book, "Poisoned Profits: How Corporate America Is Poisoning Our
Children With Toxic Chemicals," claims to "reveal the frightening and
expanding dimension of children’s chronic illnesses in the U.S. and
link this epidemic to industrial toxins."
In
attacking virtually every sort of industrial chemical, Shabecoff
implies that almost all childhood illnesses, failed pregnancies and
birth defects are attributable to the "42 billion pounds of chemicals
per day" either made in or imported into the U.S.
Shabecoff
asserts that industrial chemicals are barely regulated, companies "have
knowingly put and kept toxic products on the market," children are more
vulnerable to chemicals, "no one is safe," the health care costs
attributable to chemicals exceed $100 billion annually, and that the
solution is to go "chemical free."
If Shabecoff’s
book were turned into a movie, however, it would have to be titled,
"The Night of the Living Dead — Chemical Boogeyman Edition." Scares
about all these substances have been debunked over and over during the
last few decades.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Michelle Malkin
|
|
Thursday, 07 August 2008 |
|
Several Republican members of Congress are asking constituents to
send in their gas receipts, which will be presented to the vacationing
Democrat leadership.
Sen. Jim Inhofe asks Oklahomans:
Read rest…
Related story
|
|
|
Written by The Daily Bayonet
|
|
Thursday, 07 August 2008 |
|
They earn the award for their accomplishment in advertising without taste:
How low can activists go in
pushing a worthless cause? Face it, if we weren't supposed to eat
meat, why did God give us barbecues and steak sauce? mmm, steak sauce.
Free-speechyness: the Portage paper has refused the ad, which is their right. I wish they had run it, Peta deserved the massive backlash and fall-out that would have resulted. –The Daily Bayonet
|
|
|
Written by Climate Resistance
|
|
Thursday, 07 August 2008 |
Writing in the New Statesmen about the make up of Climate Camp protest, Stephen Armstrong says,
According to the private espionage industry itself, roughly one in four of your comrades is on a multinational’s payroll.
The idea that intelligence operatives are
running eco-protest direct action groups, such that one in four of them
are working for the man, forgets that the other three are Trustafarians whose land-owning corporate boss daddies will put them well and truly on the payroll once they decide to chill out a bit.
The spies are probably there just to pick up some fresh ideas for the
latest corporate marketing greenwash, or to inject the flailing
political parties with the illusion of a radical policy initiative.
The vanity of the environmental protest movement knows no bounds. They
imagine themselves as dangerous subversives. But really, they express
exactly the same ideas as the government.
They just use less soap.
Source
|
|
|
Written by Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit
|
|
Thursday, 07 August 2008 |
|
We seem to be having occasional success in getting things archived.
CSIRO was shamed into providing the data for their Drought Report and
David Stockwell has now reported on this.
Earlier this year, we reported
a form of academic check kiting by Ammann and Wahl, where they had
referred to Supplementary Information for key results, but failed to
provide the Supplementary Information. Flaccid peer reviewers and
flaccid editors at Climatic Change either didn’t notice or didn’t care.
Given that RE significance had been a major issue both in the original
MM articles and in the twice rejected GRL submission by Wahl and
Ammann, you’d think that someone would have spent a couple of minutes
checking out whether the argument in the SI actually worked. But, hey,…
The editors of Climatic Change didn’t have any information about the SI. When I contacted Caspar Ammann for the SI, he replied early this year in the typically ‘gracious’ Team style:
why would I even bother answering your questions, isn’t that just lost time?
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Rick Coddington, Mountain Mail
|
|
Thursday, 07 August 2008 |
|
I just learned that I am exterminating the orangutans. Wiping them off the face of the earth.
That’s right folks, the butter substitute (Smart Balance)
that I dearly love is made from palm oil and is such a great product
and so healthy for humans that it is causing the conversion of jungle
land to productive palm crop land.
Is that horrible or what?
That land conversion is, according to the eco-freaks, going to
exterminate the orangutans in 10 years.
So by 2018, these “gentle creatures” (blah blah blah), who “share so much of our DNA” (blah blah blah), are all going to die.
Once again I must choose between my lifestyle and the survival of the endangered species du jour.
So
far this week, I am killing off the orangutans by eating my butter
substitute, I am killing off the polar bears by driving my truck,
thereby causing global warming, and I am killing off all the fish in
the ocean.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Andrew Bolt, Melbourne Herald Sun
|
|
Thursday, 07 August 2008 |
Solzhenitsyn
ALEXANDER Solzhenitsyn, the Nobel Prize-winning writer who died this week, spotted the danger back when it was called communism.
Mind you, it took no great brains to see evil in an ideology that was trying to destroy him.
After all, this Russian war hero had been arrested on wild charges
of slandering Stalin and sent to the Gulag, where millions had died.
But we should be warned. When Solzhenitsyn published The Gulag Archipelago
in English from 1974, warning of the horrors of the Soviet system he'd
somehow survived, his revelations struck many intellectuals in the West
like a clap of thunder.
What? Nice communism, meant to help people, actually slaughtered them in their millions? Who'd have thought?
Well, not them. And which of our intellectuals can see now the newest form of the same totalitarian instinct?
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Matthew Vadum, newsbusters.org
|
|
Thursday, 07 August 2008 |
|
Al Gore says he wants to get America off oil but he's personally
invested in the most cutting edge oil extraction technologies. Gore is
a partner in Kleiner Perkins Caulfield & Byers,
a venture capital firm. Kleiner Perkins pours investment dollars into
green energy companies and not-so-green ones. An investment firm Gore
chairs, Generation Investment Management (GIM), entered into a partnership
with Kleiner Perkins to "provide funding and global business-building
expertise to a range of businesses, both public and private, and to
entrepreneurs." Gore makes money by promoting investments that bear the
imprimatur of Kleiner Perkins and GIM - including those in the
supposedly dirty oil business.
So Al Gore is not only in the global warming business: he's in the
oil business. This isn't Gore's first oil venture either: for years
he's profited
from oil investments. Like any smart businessman, he hedges his bets.
If the global warming business eventually peters out, he can always
make millions from black gold.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by DANIEL HENNINGER, Wall Street Journal
|
|
Thursday, 07 August 2008 |
|
For years, hyperactive environmentalists have burned
votive candles to the spirit in the sky, hoping she'd levitate energy
prices high enough to make alternatives to oil economically feasible.
That day has come. Result: The oil has hit the fan.
With gasoline over $4 and with life as they love it in
the suburbs being shut down, did people call for the windmills? Nope. A
heavy majority want to drill the bejeezus out of anywhere in America we
can find familiar black slop.
No one has been hit harder by this unexpected truth than Nancy Pelosi and her green brigades.
Fearful of an up-or-down vote on drilling for oil in,
of all places, our own country, the Pelosi House and Harry Reid's
Senate shut down Congress. House Minority Leader John Boehner calls
drilling the greatest issue Republicans have had in his political
lifetime. A party flat on its back is ready to run on oil pumps.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Elton Robinson, Farm Press
|
|
Thursday, 07 August 2008 |
|
One thing could quash the debate over “global warming” real quick — global cooling — and it could be on the way.
This
brave, against-the-grain prognostication that the Earth’s average
temperature could be actually starting to decrease comes from
agricultural meteorologist Drew Lerner, who in circles of the global
warming in-crowd is known as a “denier.”
Apparently
this is because his opinion is based on a well-grounded theory that
global warming and cooling are largely affected by factors such as
solar radiation, Arctic winds, water vapor and the El Niño/La Niña
phenomena, and less by the amount of carbon dioxide in the Earth’s
atmosphere.
Lerner’s
opinion runs contrary to those of “alarmists” such as Al Gore — who
blames man-made global warming for increased hurricane activity, rising
sea levels and making him tell a fib about creating the Internet.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Sam Bond, Environmental Data Interactive
|
|
Thursday, 07 August 2008 |
|
Acid rain caused by industrial pollution could actually help reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of agriculture, say scientists.
Research led by the Open University's Dr Vincent Gauci suggests that
sulphur-based acid rain from atmospheric pollution could cut the
methane emissions associated with cultivating rice by almost a quarter.
Tonne for tonne, methane is more than 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide in terms of global warming.
Dr Gauci's findings suggest that, ironically, the high levels of
pollution associated with China's rapid industrialisation may actually
be going some small way towards mitigating its soaring CO2 output.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|