TEN years ago, scientists specialising in climate change counted themselves lucky to find a job.
Now
employers are beating paths to their doors. From the federal Government
down, Australia's corporations and institutions, public and private,
are falling over themselves to appoint people with the knowledge and
skills to advise on what is becoming a central public policy debate.
Indeed,
one of Kevin Rudd's first decisions on becoming prime minister was to
appoint a Minister for Climate Change. Matthew England, joint head of
the University of NSW's Climate Change Research Centre, views that as
an acknowledgement of the seriousness of the issue.
"When climate change was taken out of the federal environment
portfolio and given to Penny Wong as a separate ministry, people saw it
as a demotion for (environment minister) Peter Garrett, that he
couldn't handle it," professor England said. "But I saw it as a
recognition that climate change is not just limited to the environment
-- it cuts across into economics, infrastructure and a whole range of
things. It was a true recognition of its importance."
The Climate Change Research Centre is a perfect example of the
resources being poured into understanding climate change
Australia-wide. It opened last year and now has a staff of 35 involved
in examining the biophysical side of climate change -- such as how
climate systems are changing and temperatures rising, and how the
climate responds to greenhouse gases.
Staff numbers at the centre could double over the next couple of
years -- and there are at least another 60 people from a broad range of
disciplines across the university also involved in climate change
research.
Yet even this is not enough according to centre co-director Andy Pitman.
"I think the scale of the challenge has mushroomed and I think
that's why university research groups are forming at an unprecedented
rate to address it," professor Pitman said. "To put it in perspective,
even a centre the size of ours at UNSW can't cover all of the areas in
which we need expertise."
Demand for climate change courses is strong among undergraduates,
and England believes universities have been struggling to keep pace.
"We're under-resourced in the sense that we're not graduating enough
people with the right skills to fill all these growing areas," he says.
"To be fair, the demand has sprung up relatively quickly and I think
the education system has got a couple of years of hard work ahead to
get the courses up and running to deliver the right graduates."
Those graduating are finding their skills in high demand. England
says graduates with PhDs specialising in climate change science are
earning around $65,000 to $70,000. And those with more than five years'
experience can earn significantly more.
The Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers
Australia chief executive John Vines says, "In the late 90s there was a
reasonable level of unemployment among environmental scientists, and
that means that there are fewer people from that age cohort in
industry, because they just went into other occupations.
"It means that for companies looking for experienced environmental
scientists and environmental engineers, particularly those with a good
knowledge of climate change, they can be hard to find, and that's
really pushing up salaries.
"Demand is the other factor, as organisations become more conscious
of their carbon footprint and as the infrastructure and mining areas
become much more aware of the need to have an environmentally
appropriate outcome for their projects. In the last five years demand
in the private sector has been accelerating considerably.
"I think in the future graduates, when they make a decision about
whether to join that company or not, will be looking at what sort of a
carbon footprint an organisation has " he said.
"That will factor into an employer-of-choice component, and so
companies will increasingly see the need to minimise their carbon
footprint and use that in promotional material to emphasise that they
are a good company to work for."
It's already happening at companies such as PricewaterhouseCoopers.
PwC environment law director Sean Lucy says there is a tangible "buzz"
around climate change issues for graduates. "All our graduates want to
know about PwC's commitment to becoming carbon neutral, they want to
understand how they can respond to the issue professionally. It's an
important part of how they rate us, and whether they want to work for
us."
PwC's climate change services division has grown from 10 people two
years ago to 40 today, and further growth is projected. The division
advises businesses on a range of climate change considerations,
including strategy developments, regulatory changes and emissions
management.
"In the last 18 months there's been an incredible growth in the
depth of our capability and the range of businesses who want to talk
about this issue, from NGOs to federal and state governments and from
ASX200 companies to start-up businesses," Lucy says. "There wouldn't be
one level of the Australian economy where we haven't got some level of
interest (in our climate change services)."
PwC environment law partner Andrew Petersen forecasts ongoing
growth. "Over time we're going to see new specialisations needed," he
says. "They're not climate change experts as such, but they're experts
in the field of the economics of embedding a carbon price into the
value of your business, experts on developing carbon reduction
strategies, or monetising carbon reduction projects.
"You're going to see both an expansion in terms of numbers and types
of service offerings out there that are related to climate change."
Climate change has been on the agenda for many years at the CSIRO.
Chris Mitchell, research leader of climate, weather and ocean
prediction, leads 250 people working on climate change-related research
including drought, severe weather forecasting and greenhouses gases in
the atmosphere.
"I don't think it (climate change) is flavour of the month -- I see
it as a strategic shift towards sustainability," he says. "Ten to 15
years ago there were not many people who worked on environmental
matters -- outside a very few people working on the regulatory
environment.
"Now we have people working on corporate sustainability, on greenhouse gas management plans, on a whole range of things."
Mitchell says climate change scientists are now finding their skills
in demand in the private sector. "Companies are going to need to
understand what their carbon risk is, what their greenhouse emissions
footprint is. We have carbon trading on the horizon. In the corporate
world these aspects of climate change are becoming increasingly
important and unless you've got the analytical capability, you're just
guessing." Source
|