CCF Editor's Note: It was only a matter of time before the major green groups brought an enviro-mental case against the Department of Interior. Apparently their driving force is the precautionary principle, an environmentalist's "central guide for action," which should be a red flag to anyone who values democracy. As Al Pacino said in the "Devil's Advocate" regarding the Law, and I'm paraphrasing, "That's our ticket in...[The lawyers] are coming out, guns blazing...What we cannot legislate we will buy. What we cannot buy we will degrade. We will blow every fuse of enlightenment until it looks like a vandalized, neon sign!" Sounds like that's already happening. The following AP article illustrates this point.

HEADLINE Critics: Polar bear plan must fight global warming

by DAN JOLING, Associated Press Writer

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — Conservation groups returned to court to challenge Bush administration efforts to help save the polar bear, saying federal officials' refusal to include steps against global warming violates the Endangered Species Act.

In court documents filed late Friday, the Center for Biological Diversity and other groups asked a federal judge to reject Interior Department actions that were announced last week.

Polar bears are threatened with extinction in many areas because of the melting of their sea ice habitat. The groups say greenhouse gas emissions have led to rapid melting in the Arctic.

Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne, facing a court deadline because of the groups' earlier lawsuit, had announced Wednesday that polar bears would be listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act.

Among the steps he proposed to help them were increasing research and working with Canada to help the bears survive in the wild. But he rejected the addition of broad steps to reduce greenhouse gases, saying he would not allow the Endangered Species Act to be "misused" to regulate global climate change.

Kassie Siegel, climate director for the CBD, said the administration's proposal "violates both logic and the law" because it did not address the primary threat to polar bears. The listing of polar bears under the law is significant, she acknowledged, but the groups want them classified as endangered, a more serious category than threatened.

Joining in the court case were Greenpeace and the Natural Resources Defense Council. They announced their new federal court filing on Tuesday. A message left with the Department of the Interior in Washington was not immediately returned.

Kempthorne said Americans deserve an honest assessment of the costs and benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Quoting President Bush, he said the decision should not be left to "unelected regulators and judges" who enforce the Endangered Species Act. He also said any real solution requires action by all major world economies.   Source

Average user rating