| on Jun 12, 2008, 03:34 PM E.S.T.
|
The next time some New York Times reporter wants to write about how
man is responsible for warming the planet, maybe he should take a look
at an amazing article his paper published on July 15, 1993, largely
refuting any connection between the burning of fossil fuels and rising
temperatures.
Written by Walter Sullivan, "Study of Greenland Ice Finds Rapid Change in Past Climate" addressed findings that suggest "the
period of stable climate in which human civilization has flourished
might be unusual, and that the current climate may get either warmer or
colder much more quickly than had been believed -- in spans of decades
or even less."
Doesn't sound like today's hysterical press
claims concerning global warming, does it? Neither does this (emphasis
added throughout):
The scientists said their data showed that significantly
warmer periods and significantly colder periods had occurred during the
last interval between glacial epochs, about 115,000 to 135,000 years ago.
They said they could not tell whether that meant similar changes were
in store. Their findings were reported today in two papers in the
journal Nature. [...]
The new studies found that the average
global temperature can change as much as 18 degrees Fahrenheit in a
couple of decades during interglacial periods, [Dr. J. W. C. White
of the Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research of the University of
Colorado] said. The current average global temperature is 59 degrees
Fahrenheit.
Wow. You mean natural forces -- i.e.
unrelated to anything done by man! -- can create temperature swings of
18 degrees in a couple of decades? And folks like Nobel Laureate Al
Gore, along with most in the media and an overwhelming majority of
Democrats in Congress are advocating economically destabilizing
legislation all because temperatures have risen about one degree in the
past 150 years?
But there was more:
The
research on the last period between glaciers is considered important
because it may provide hints about the effects of rising levels of
atmospheric gases, like carbon dioxide, that have a warming effect
similar to that caused by the glass in a greenhouse.
"As the last interglacial seems to have been slightly warmer than the present one," the new report said, "its unstable climate raises questions about the effects of future global warming."
Pay particular attention to this next segment:
At one point between the last two glacial epochs, the climate melted enough polar ice to raise sea levels some 30 feet. As noted by a member of the drilling team, Dr. David A. Peel of the British Antarctic Survey, it was so warm in England that hippopotamuses wallowed in the Thames and lions roamed its banks.
And this happened without the anthropogenic burning of fossil fuels? How can that be?
In his commentary, Dr. White wrote: "We
humans have built a remarkable socioeconomic system during perhaps the
only time when it could be built, when climate was sufficiently stable
to allow us to develop the agricultural infrastructure required to
maintain an advanced society. We don't know why we have been so
blessed, but even without human intervention, the climate system is
capable of stunning variability.
"If the Earth came with an operating manual, the chapter on climate might begin with a caveat that the system has been adjusted at the factory for optimum comfort, so don't touch the dials."
Don't touch the dials. Amen to that, brother! Source
|