| on Jun 17, 2008, 11:29 AM E.S.T.
|
Some early overnight reaction to the belated endorsement of Barack Obama by Al Gore. And it might disappoint the former vice president and loser in the 2000 White House race.
Exactly what Gore was waiting for in the past two weeks since Obama
sewed up his party's nomination is unclear. Maybe he just wanted to go
to Michigan where his prize-winning environmental pitch is so very less
welcome than other places that don't make so many large cars.
Or maybe he was waiting until his endorsement meant absolutely nothing.
Anyway, as The Ticket reported,
Gore said all the right things in his endorsement speech, except he
noticeably left out the last Democratic president, the one who chose to
elevate Gore from has-been senator to his running mate and has been the
only Democrat elected president twice since World War II, which is like
the Middle Ages for today's voters.
But within minutes online reaction was underwhelming. Joe Gandelman, editor-in-chief over at The Moderate Voice, who is usually, well, very moderate, posted an item titled "Obama gets 'the' Endorsement: The Lousy Timing of Al Gore."
He had this to say:
"Perhaps one day someone will write a chapter in a new book about Al
Gore titled 'Profiles in Uncourage.'...But it came so late in the game
that the person who'll be most impressed with it will be Tipper Gore."
After that the item went downhill. Gandelman said the endorsement so long-sought by Obama and Hillary Clinton was by now such an anti-climax that it resembled the ponderings about whether Ralph Nader would run yet again.
Ouch, how'd you like to be compared to the 21st century's Harold Stassen?
"Not exactly "Man bites dog" news. Who is Gore going to endorse? John McCain?" asked John Mariner in The Ticket's comments section.
Sam Patel added: "It's a sad day to see one of the Clinton's most loyal supporters essentially dis-own them! Like Bill Richardson,
Al Gore was a complete nobody had it not been for Bill Clinton's risky
generosity. I bet he now regrets some of those appointments."
Up at the San Francisco Chronicle's politics blog, Joe Garofoli wrote:
"We know this will never happen, but hopefully Al will tell us tonight
why he didn't endorse somebody when it WOULD HAVE MEANT SOMETHING. Like
in February.
"Then again, think of it from his perspective. In his forseable role
as Captain Planet, he's going to need to work with whomever would be
president, so why burn a bridge with a nomination. But isn't Al big
enough now (is that a Nobel in your pocket?) that he doesn't have to
worry about such petty political matters."
Guess not. Source
|