| on Jun 18, 2008, 09:32 AM E.S.T.
|
The environmental movement, only recently poised for major advances on
global warming and other issues, has suddenly found itself on the
defensive as high gasoline prices shift the political climate
nationwide and trigger defections by longtime supporters.
Opposition
to offshore drilling -- once ironclad in places like California and
Florida -- has begun to soften. Gov. Charlie Crist of Florida on
Tuesday eased his opposition to new energy exploration off the coast.
"Floridians are suffering, and when you're paying over $4 a gallon for
gas, you have to wonder whether there might be additional resources
that we might be able to utilize to bring that price down," said Crist,
a Republican.
At the same time, pressure to drill is mounting.
President Bush today is expected to call on Congress to lift the ban on
new offshore drilling, and a House committee will consider a proposal
to relax the moratorium.
John McCain, the presumed Republican
presidential nominee, opposed new offshore drilling in his 2000
presidential campaign. He said Tuesday that he now supported lifting
the long-standing ban.
"I
believe it is time for federal government to lift these restrictions
and put our own reserves to use," the Arizona senator said in a Houston
speech on energy security.
Much of the nation's coastal waters
are off-limits to new oil and gas leasing until 2012 under executive
orders first issued by Bush's father,President George H.W. Bush, in
1991 and extended by President Clinton in 1998. In addition, Congress
has taken action annually since 1981 to preclude drilling in coastal
areas.
But high petroleum prices have caused policymakers to
begin rethinking a variety of issues, including opening the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge to energy exploration and imposing mandatory
limits on greenhouse gas emissions from oil refineries and power
plants.
"For years I have argued that we should avoid offshore
drilling and tapping into underground reserves in ANWR until there was
an emergency that left us with no choice," Rep. James T. Walsh
(R-N.Y.), a longtime backer of the drilling ban, said recently. "That
time has come."
The developments are the latest indication of the growing power of energy prices to overwhelm other priorities.
"We're
seeing a large shift in public attitudes toward exploration," said C.
Jeffrey Eshelman of the Independent Petroleum Assn. of America,
expressing hope that McCain's change of heart "breaks ground for others
to follow."
Environmentalists are increasingly concerned.
Richard Charter of the Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund called this
"the most risky year in 29 years" for the drilling ban.
In one
sign of concern, an effort to pass a major climate-change bill stumbled
this month amid complaints from Democrats as well as Republicans that
it would drive up energy prices.
McCain, in reversing his
long-held position in support of the offshore ban, said he continued to
oppose drilling in the Arctic refuge, an environmentally sensitive
wilderness that he said deserved to stay off-limits.
Environmental
groups, as well as McCain's Democratic rival, Sen. Barack Obama, argued
that renewed offshore drilling would not increase supplies or lower
prices for years. They warned that new drilling off California and
other states would carry the risk of pollution.
Douglas
Holtz-Eakin, a senior advisor to McCain's campaign, acknowledged in a
conference call to reporters that new offshore drilling would have no
immediate effect on supplies or prices.
But he added: "There is an important element in signaling to world oil markets that we are serious."
Congressional
Republicans have been seizing on high energy prices to ratchet up the
pressure on Democrats to allow more domestic drilling.
"For a
long time, for appropriate reasons, we've been very sensitive about
offshore drilling in California because of our beautiful Pacific
Coast," Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-Redlands) said recently on the House floor,
adding that technology could allow for a second look. Read rest...
|