|
Arctic ice melt may be due to undersea volcanoes |
|
|
|
Written by Thomas Lifson, American Thinker
|
|
Thursday, 26 June 2008 |
The Arctic ice that is
supposedly melting, stranding those cuddly looking polar bears, just
might be affected by a wave of volcanic eruptions on the ocean floor
under the Arctic ice cap. AFP reports
on the recently-documented volcanoes, but oddly makes no mention of the
possible effect on apocalyptic predictions of global warming.
Recent
massive volcanoes have risen from the ocean floor deep under the Arctic
ice cap, spewing plumes of fragmented magma into the sea, scientists
who filmed the aftermath reported Wednesday.
The
eruptions - as big as the one that buried Pompei - took place in 1999
along the Gakkel Ridge, an underwater mountain chain snaking 1,800
kilometres (1,100 miles) from the northern tip of Greenland to Siberia.
Scientists suspected even at the time that a simultaneous series of earthquakes were linked to these volcanic spasms.
But
when a team led of scientists led by Robert Sohn of the Woods Hole
Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts finally got a first-ever
glimpse of the ocean floor 4,000 meters (13,000 feet) beneath the
Arctic pack ice, they were astonished.
What
they saw was unmistakable evidence of explosive eruptions rather than
the gradual secretion of lava bubbling up from Earth's mantle onto the
ocean floor...
Steve Gilbert of Sweetness & Light draws our attention to the report, and makes all the connections AFP studiously ignores:
Er,
is it not possible that these volcanic eruptions - going back to at
least 1999 - may have played a part in whatever melting there has been
of the Greenland and Arctic ice sheets?
If there has even been any

For according to the global warming cultists scientists at NOAA's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, the decline seems to have begun in earnest around 1999.
But isn't it funny how not one word of this possibility was ever mentioned in the original article?
Why is that?
Do
not hold your breath waiting for the major media to trumpet this
dramatic new discovery and the implication that anthropogenic global
warming theory has nothign to do with polar bears. Source
|