| on Jun 30, 2008, 10:01 AM E.S.T.
|
When farmers take their families to the zoo you can bet they spend as
much time enjoying the polar bears as anybody does. But their
appreciation for the white fluffy guys has its limitations.
Those limitations are probably best expressed by the highly respected Pacific Legal Foundation, or PLF, in Sacramento. It is a public service law firm that fights for individual rights, and it believes the rights of many individuals, especially farm landowners, risk being trampled by the polar bears and their two-legged friends.
By listing polar bears as an endangered species as it did in mid-May, Congress has motivated PLF to fight the listing with all its energy. PLF calls the listing "government intrusion so potentially devastating that it could bring our country to its knees."
Admittedly that is strong rhetoric, especially for the normally
restrained and moderate firm of experienced attorneys. It regards the
polar bear listing as drastically increasing the regulatory burden on
people.
Environmentalists' agenda
A number of hard-core environmentalist groups have been pushing the
polar bear agenda for years, tying its so-called endangered status to
global warming and melting Arctic ice. Congress ducked the
global-warming connection in authorizing the listing, but the
environmental groups immediately set in motion legal action to
reconnect the two.
PLF explains that blaming global warming for the bears' dilemma will
lead to shutting down any activity suspected of contributing to the
warming, beginning with oil and gas exploration in Alaska first,
elsewhere later.
Additional potential targets are automobile manufacturing, energy
generation, family home construction, road construction and farming.
Eventually the guilty can include any human enterprise or endeavor that
assumes to harm the bears with CO2 emissions.
The PLF attorneys, who probably enjoy watching the polar bears
cavort in their zoo enclosures, get right to the point when they blame
not the bears but the Endangered Species Act itself for opening the
door to the kind of economic paralysis they predict. Many farmers have
long suspected the act as a gigantic overreaction.
However, the PLF statement and intended action make it clear that
the thrust of radical environmentalists, who created and have promoted
the Endangered Species Act for decades, rests in an anti-people bias
joined with a harsh command-and-control implementation.
Remember the spotted owl? Its uncompromising listing virtually destroyed the timber industry in the Northwest. Read rest...
|