|
"I want you to think about this," Barack Obama said in
Las Vegas last week. "The oil companies have already been given 68
million acres of federal land, both onshore and offshore, to drill.
They're allowed to drill it, and yet they haven't touched it – 68
million acres that have the potential to nearly double America's total
oil production."
Wow, how come the oil companies didn't think of that?
Perhaps because the notion is obviously false – at
least to anyone who knows how oil and gas exploration actually works.
Predictably, however, Mr. Obama's claim is also the mantra of Nancy
Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, John Kerry, Nick Rahall and others writing
Congressional energy policy. As a public service, here's a remedial
education.
Democrats are in a vise this summer, pinned on one
side by voter anger over $4 gas and on the other by their ideological
opposition to carbon-based energy – so, as always, the political first
resort is to blame Big Oil. The allegation is that oil companies are
"stockpiling" leases on federal lands to drive up gas prices. At least
liberals are finally acknowledging the significance of supply and
demand.
To deflect the GOP effort to relax the
offshore-drilling ban – and thus boost supply while demand will remain
strong – Democrats also say that most of the current leases are
"nonproducing." The idea comes from a "special report" prepared by the
Democratic staff of the House Resources Committee, chaired by Mr.
Rahall. "If we extrapolate from today's production rates on federal
lands and waters," the authors write, the oil companies could "nearly
double total U.S. oil production" (their emphasis).
In other words, these whiz kids assume that every acre
of every lease holds the same amount of oil and gas. Yet the existence
of a lease does not guarantee that the geology holds recoverable
resources. Brian Kennedy of the Institute for Energy Research quips
that, using the same extrapolation, the 9.4 billion acres of the
currently nonproducing moon should yield 654 million barrels of oil per
day.
Nonetheless, the House still went through with a
gesture called the "use it or lose it" bill, which passed on Thursday
223-195. It would be pointless even if it had a chance of becoming law.
Oil companies acquire leases in the expectation that some of them
contain sufficient oil and gas to cover the total costs. Yet it takes
years to move through federal permitting, exploration and development.
The U.S. Minerals Management Service notes that only one of three wells
results in a discovery of oil that can be recovered economically. In
deeper water, it's one of five. All this involves huge risks, capital
investment – and time.
If anything, the Democrats ought to be dancing in the
streets about "idle" leases. It means fewer rigs. The days of
hit-or-miss wildcatting have been relegated to the past by new, more
efficient technologies, such as seismic imaging, directional drilling
(wells that are "steered" underground) and multilateral drilling
(multiple underground offshoots from a single wellbore).
At the same time, finding new reservoirs has become
far more complex. Except for a few very large fields discovered decades
ago like Prudhoe Bay, most recent discoveries have been smaller, deeper
and less concentrated. The U.S. needs a continuous supply of
discoveries to replace declining wells.
Yet companies are not allowed to explore where the
biggest prospects for oil and gas may exist – especially on the Outer
Continental Shelf. Seven of the top 20 U.S. oil fields are now located
in analogous deepwater areas (greater than 1,000 feet) in the Gulf of
Mexico. In 2006, Chevron discovered what is likely to be the largest
American oil find since Prudhoe, drilled in 7,000 feet of water and
more than 20,000 feet under the sea floor. The Wilcox formation may
have an upper end of 15 billion barrels of recoverable oil and should
begin producing by 2014 – perhaps ushering in a new ultradeepwater
frontier.
Likewise, in April, the U.S. Geological Survey revised
its estimate for the Bakken Shale, underneath the badlands of North
Dakota and Montana. The new assessment – as much as 4.3 billion barrels
of oil – is a 25-fold increase over what the Survey believed in 1995.
Such breakthroughs confirm that very large reserves exist, if only
Congress would let business get at them.
All of which has Democrats sweating bullets. The
leadership is desperate to avoid debating a Department of Interior
spending bill, because they know Republicans will offer amendments
lifting the drilling moratorium that may peel off some Democrats. Last
week, Chairman David Obey shut down the Appropriations Committee rather
than countenance more domestic energy production. Given Democratic
energy illiteracy, this is a fight the GOP can win if it keeps up the
pressure. Source
|