Congress continues to wrestle with $4-a-gallon gas this week as the
two parties attempt to gain the upper hand on a top voter issue before
heading home to campaign during the August recess.
Already candidates are using pain at the pump to try to move voters
in their direction. Democratic state Sen. Dina Titus kicked off her
challenge to Republican Rep. Jon Porter at a gas station, where she
tried to link the three-term incumbent to the energy policies of the
Bush administration.
Porter asked residents in his Henderson-area district to send him
their gas receipts so he could show House Speaker Nancy Pelosi the
hardship gas prices are causing under Democratic control of Congress.
It is uncertain whether any of the proposals in Congress would have
substantial immediate effects at the pump, but still lawmakers press on
in hopes of making a dent in both gas prices and public opinion.
Today, the Senate will hold a pivotal vote on a bill to rein in oil
market speculation, which Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority
leader, believes is responsible for up to 50 percent of the increased
pump price.
Yet it is becoming increasingly clear that Democrats’ strategy may not be enough to win the hearts and minds of voters.
Polls show an inverse relationship has formed this summer between
Americans’ pain at the pump and their objection to drilling. Most
Americans now support more drilling.
Republicans are hammering home the message that gas prices are high
because Democrats won’t drill. For anyone who just paid triple digits
to fill up, such talking points could resonate.
Last week, House Democrats went on the defensive, cleverly naming
their Drill Responsibly in Leased Lands Act of 2008 the “DRILL Act.” It
created a use-it-or-lose-it proposition for oil companies that are
sitting on federal leases in the National Petroleum Reserve near the
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska.
Porter was among 26 Republicans who crossed party lines last week to
vote for the DRILL Act, but it failed to get the two-thirds needed to
pass. Democratic Rep. Shelley Berkley voted for the bill. Republican
Rep. Dean Heller voted against it.
Heller joined a group of primarily freshmen Republicans tapped to
join House leaders last weekend on a visit to a renewable energy lab in
Colorado and the oil fields of Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay and Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge. The trips were part of the Republican’s energy
strategy, dubbed “all of the above.”
Heller is expected to discuss the trip today at a briefing with
fellow Republicans as they push for more Alaskan drilling as well as
renewable energy development.
In an op-ed about the trip, the Republican leader, Rep. John Boehner
of Ohio, said the renewable energy lab was a symbol of the country’s
energy future, but “we’re not there just yet.”
Instead, he called for development of natural oil and gas resources
in Alaska in the Arctic refuge that he said have been locked away by
Democratic leaders who “worship ... at the altar ... of radical
environmentalism.”
But in the Senate, Republicans have mostly given up on drilling in
the refuge for now, especially given the opposition of the party’s
presumed presidential nominee, Sen. John McCain. They have focused
legislation on oil shale development in the Western states, renewable
energy and a plan to allow states to act unilaterally to lift offshore
drilling bans.
But Democrats are loath to open waters along the coasts of
California or Florida to drilling — a subject off-limits for many
environmentalists who remember the Santa Barbara oil spill of 1969,
which helped launch today’s protections.
Instead, Democrats have been pushing bills to release oil from the
nation’s strategic reserve, penalize price gougers and require oil
companies to develop oil fields under their existing leases.
Democratic leaders appear unwilling to allow the proposal on
offshore drilling to go to a vote because they fear too many members of
their own party would join Republicans and approve the plan. Also,
holding a vote would force Democrats who oppose the ban to go on record
opposing a popular idea just 12 weeks before the election.
(Already the Senate Republicans’ bill has 54 co-sponsors, including
five Democrats. In fact, Titus, the Democratic candidate, favors the
Republican approach on offshore drilling, agreeing the states should be
able to decide.)
Pelosi told CNN on Sunday she had no plans to bring such a bill before the House.
Reid has said he is open to increasing domestic production, but
insists the country cannot expect to drill its way out of the current
crisis.
“This could be a chance for Democrats and Republicans to work
together,” Reid said from the floor Monday. “But so far, we’ve seen
more of the same from the Republican side: nice rhetoric, no action.” Source
|