| Dud studies behind Rudd’s freakish claims |
|
|
| Written by Andrew Bolt, Melbourne Herald Sun | |||
| Tuesday, 05 August 2008 | |||
|
Dr David Stockwell, a leading expert on ecological niche modeling, checked the CSIRO’s figures and assumptions behind its warning of more drought thanks to global warming, and found in fact: Stockwell’s conclusions were hampered by the CSIRO’s refusal to hand over the data it had used to make its terrifying predictions. Eventually the CSIRO caved in, and Stockwell has since crunched its numbers and found the CSIRO’s models are in fact worthless, not even being able to “predict” past climate:
This corroborates a recent study warning that climate models of the kind actually relied upon by the CSIRO are of no predictive value, given the difference between what they predict and what actually happens:
And statistician Ian Castles has likewise discovered that the CSIRO seems to be contradicting itself when predicting worse droughts. In short, Kevin Rudd seized on dud studies, useless models and contradictory findings to whip up global warming fears when he claimed:
You have been misled. Only registered users can write comments!
3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved." |
|||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|








