Students who are being taught climate science are being
indoctrinated into a narrow viewpoint of climate science [thanks to Ben
Herman and Phil Krider for alerting us to this article]. The article
below published by the American Association of Physics Teachers documents this bias.
Michael D. Mastrandrea and Stephen H. Schneider, 2008: Resource Letter GW-2: Global Warming. American Journal of Physics, Volume 76, Issue 7, pp. 608-614
This article is a “Resource Letter” whose mandate is described below:
Resource Letters are guides for college and university
physicists, astronomers, and other scientists to literature, websites,
and other teaching aids. Each Resource Letter focuses on a particular
topic and is intended to help teachers improve course content in a
specific field of physics or to introduce nonspecialists to this field.
The Resource Letters Editorial Board meets at the AAPT Winter Meeting
to choose topics for which Resource Letters will be commissioned during
the ensuing year. Items in the Resource Letter below are labeled with
the letter E to indicate elementary level or material of general
interest to persons seeking to become informed in the field, the letter
I to indicate intermediate level or somewhat specialized material, or
the letter A to indicate advanced or specialized material. No Resource
Letter is meant to be exhaustive and complete; in time there may be
more than one Resource Letter on a given subject. A complete list by
field of all Resource Letters published to date is at the website
www.kzoo.edu/ajp/letters.html. Suggestions for future Resource Letters,
including those of high pedagogical value, are welcome and should be
sent to Professor Roger H. Stuewer, Editor, AAPT Resource Letters,
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, 116 Church
Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455; e-mail:
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
with the abstract
This Resource Letter provides a guide to the literature on
human-induced climate change, also known as global warming: Resource
Letter GW-1: Global Warming, John W. Firor, Am. J. Phys. 62, 490–495
1994. After an introductory overview, journal articles, books, and
websites are cited for the following topics: the greenhouse effect and
radiative forcing, detection and attribution of human-induced climate
change, carbon cycle feedbacks, paleoclimate, climate models and
modeling uncertainties, projections of future climate change and
climate impacts, and mitigation and adaptation policy options.
As an example of the exclusion of papers on climate issues, with
respect to the 2003 western Europe heat wave, the authors include the
papers
Human contribution to the European heatwave of 2003,” P. A. Stott, D. A. Stone, and M. R. Allen, Nature London 423, 610–614 2004
“More intense, more frequent, and longer lasting heat waves in the
21st century,” G. A. Meehl and C. Tebaldi, Science 305, 994–997 2004
yet ignored papers that conflicted with the conclusions in the above papers; e.g.
Chase, T.N., K. Wolter, R.A. Pielke Sr., and Ichtiaque Rasool, 2006:
Was the 2003 European summer heat wave unusual in a global context?
Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L23709, doi:10.1029/2006GL027470
whose conclusions were indepencently confirmed in
Connolley W.M. 2008: Comment on “Was the 2003 European summer heat wave unusual in a global context?”by Thomas N. Chase et al. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L02703, doi:10.1029/2007GL031171.
as discussed in
Chase, T.N., K. Wolter, R.A. Pielke Sr., and Ichtiaque Rasool, 2008: Reply to comment by W.M. Connolley on ‘‘Was the 2003 European summer heat wave unusual in a global context?’’Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L02704, doi:10.1029/2007GL031574.
Other climate topics were similarly presented selectively; for example, the neglect of the paper
Feddema et al. 2005: The importance of land-cover change in simulating future climates., 310, 1674-1678
where landscape change in this century was found in thier model runs
to be a first order climate forcing. However, this viewpoint was
ignored.
The article does contain valuable references (they do include a cite to the 2005 National Research Council report,
for example), but, except for that publication, it does not
communicate the range of peer reviewed papers and books that conflict
with the author’s viewpoint.
The article clearly misinforms the students and the physics
teachers as to the actual diversity of issues with respect to the human
role within the climate system, as well as the significance of natural
climate forcings and feedbacks.
Climate Science recommends that physics teachers read more
widely than the list in the American Association of Physics Teachers
resource list.
While, we, of course, also have our own biases, our book
Cotton, W.R. and R.A. Pielke, 2007: Human impacts on weather and climate, Cambridge University Press, 330 pp
does provide a more inclusive set of peer reviewed papers and
research summaries than is provided in the Mastrandreaa and Schneider
article.
Source
|
