Why in an age of apocalyptic mass hysteria over global warming are the Greens polling so weakly?
They should have everything going for them, including
benefiting from disgruntled Labour voters seeking an acceptable neutral
home for their votes. Yet the polls have them wallowing around the
demise-threatening 5 per cent mark.
One can but speculate on this thin support.
I attribute it to an image of screaming wetness. The memory of
bearded goofy men and plain earnest women, folk- dancing at their
conference a few years ago, lingers on.
Perhaps in the public's perception they have been rendered
irrelevant by mainstream parties embracing their cause, which may
explain their fading political support elsewhere in the world.
Getting rid of the Nandor goose should have helped, as it's
impossible to take seriously a party including an MP who believes Haile
Selassie was God.
Embarrassed by this, nearly half a century back Selassie (Ras is an
Ethiopian equivalent to lord and Tafari his birth name) travelled to
Jamaica where the nonsense began, and before a stadium filled with
unwanted disciples, he told them they had cocked up and got the wrong
bloke.
"I'm not God," he pleaded.
"Yes you are, you bugger, admit it," the halfwits roared back and,
in despair, Selassie returned home and proved his mortality by being
murdered.
So are the Greens now redundant?
If I was to define a continuing parliamentary role for them I would
argue they should be environmental watchdogs but abandon
conservationism.
Conservatism in any form is a blind belief in the status quo,
exposing a lack of imagination and ignorant refusal to accept that
constant change is the primary characteristic of all life forms.
This applies to religious conservatives, currently the source of
most of the world's troubles, to political conservatives of both left
and right who are pathetically fearful of change, and to environmental
conservatives, dullards in the extreme who see the indigenous fauna as
sacrosanct and are even bigger killjoy pests than most of the
introduced elements they pursue.
Another problem for the Greens as a political movement is being a
single issue party, for when it comes to the crunch in the voting
booth, the public understand that, with MMP, every vote counts in
determining the government and to accord it to such parties may be
deemed a luxury too far.
WORLDWIDE the politicised Greens have never hidden their leftish
sympathies. Indeed, they arose from the collapse of socialist ideology
and the bossy misanthropic elements of the old left.
Their holier-than-thou disdain for their fellow citizens is all too
evident, epitomised by the preposterously insulting and unrealistic
anti-smacking legislation, introduced by their MP, Sue Bradford.
Nevertheless, it would never have been passed without Labour's
whole- hearted approval. What was astonishing was John Key running with
it, subject to an amendment allowing police to apply commonsense
judgment.
Prosecutions to date suggest that was optimistic in the extreme, but
Mr Key wasted an opportunity to stand aside and benefit from the public
outrage.
Like all zealots, the Greens go too far and, for that reason, it may
be better if they're moderated by remaining outside Parliament as a
lobby group.
They should abandon their negative Pol Potism-without-the-guns,
backward- looking conservationism and refocus on environmentalism,
embracing economic growth and recognising the benefits of genetic
engineering and nuclear power as the answer to mankind's two most
pressing needs.
Perhaps their new co-leader can re- steer them on to a fresh, positive and progressive path.
But, having said that, the Greens, along with only ACT and the Maori
Party, have one huge redeeming feature. That is they seek
representation for genuine altruistic and caring reasons.
Everyone else chasing your vote is pursuing their own personal careerist ends, regardless of the claptrap they spout.
Source
|