|
American media ignores inconvenient science on global warming |
|
|
|
Written by Jerome J. Schmitt, American Thinker
|
|
Monday, 24 March 2008 |
|
Page 2 of 2
Here's what she has to say about NASA's new climate research satellite:
"The
satellite was only launched in 2002 and it enabled the collection of
data, not just on temperature but also on cloud formation and water
vapour. What all the climate models suggest is that, when you've got
warming from additional carbon dioxide, this will result in increased
water vapour, so you're going to get a positive feedback. That's what
the models have been indicating. What this great data from the NASA
Aqua satellite ... (is) actually showing is just the opposite, that
with a little bit of warming, weather processes are compensating, so
they're actually limiting the greenhouse effect and you're getting a
negative rather than a positive feedback." (Ellipses in original)
Further, she says:
"The
policy implications are enormous. The meteorological community at the
moment is really just coming to terms with the output from this NASA
Aqua satellite and (climate scientist) Roy Spencer's interpretation of
them. His work is published, his work is accepted, but I think people
are still in shock at this point."
Isn't it odd that this "shocking" news hasn't been reported yet in the American Press?
Following his transcript of the interview, Pearson goes on to anticipate the impending exposure of the climate change hoax:
"A
great many founts of authority, from the Royal Society to the UN, most
heads of government along with countless captains of industry, learned
professors, commentators and journalists will be profoundly
embarrassed. Let us hope it is a prolonged and chastening experience."
Ya think? Source
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>
|
