Take our survey!

After you vote, you'll be able to see the latest results
Which political affiliation best describes you?

Sign up for daily news digest:

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

YouCMSAndBlog Module Generator Wizard Plugin

Not Evil Just Wrong

not-evil-earth.jpg

  “The Movie that Al Gore and the Environmentalists Don’t Want You to See"
Coming to theatres soon!

Syndicate

Has the IPCC inflated the feedback factor? Print E-mail
Written by Christopher Monckton via Climate Science   
 
on Apr 8, 2008, 03:06 PM E.S.T.

As Climate Science offers, we are open to the presentation of announcement of papers and of viewpoints by individuals actively involved in the climate science and climate policy community who want to widely distribute their views and analyses on climate science. Today, Climate Science presents a guest weblog by Christopher Monckton on the issue of radiative feedback.  Christopher Monckton has been an outspoken commentator on climate policy issues, however, his guest weblog on Climate Science concerns a science issue; namely what is the magnitude of the radiative feedback as reported by the IPCC? Climate Science has weblogged on this subject in

Climate Metric Reality Check #1 - The Sum Of Climate Forcings and Feedbacks Is Less Than The 2007 IPCC Best Estimate Of Human Climate Forcing Of Global Warming

Other climate scientists are encouraged to submit guest weblogs which support or seek to refute the analysis presented below. Ultimately, each contribution of this type needs to be submitted to peer reviewed scientific journals which is the most appropriate aribitrator of science.

Guest Weblog Christopher Monckton

In the IPCC’s methodology, climate sensitivity ΔTλ to radiative forcing is the product of three factors:

1. Tropopausal radiative forcing ΔF

ΔF  ≈  5.35 ln(C/C0)  ==>   ΔF2x   ≈  5.35 ln 2         W m-2,        (1)

where (C/C0) is a proportionate increase in CO2 concentration and, specifically, ΔF2x ≈ 3.708 W m-2 is the radiative forcing at CO2 doubling. For simplicity, no significant error will arise here if it is assumed that all other anthropogenic forcings are slightly net-negative, so that ΔF2x ≈ 5 ln 2 ≈ 3.466 W m-2.

2. The no-feedbacks climate sensitivity parameter κ

κ  =  ΔTκ / ΔF  =  ΔTλ / (ΔF + bΔTλ)        °K W-1 m2,              (2)

where ΔTκ is the temperature response to forcings only, without feedbacks; ΔTλ is the temperature change in response to forcings plus feedbacks; and b is the sum in W m-2 °K-1 of all unamplified temperature feedbacks. The key parameter κ is not mentioned in IPCC (2007), and no error-bars are given. The value κ ≈ 0.313 °K W-1 m2 implicit in IPCC (2007) is the reciprocal of the “radiative cooling response” -

“Under these simplifying assumptions the amplification [f] of the global warming from a feedback parameter [b] (in W m-2 °C-1) with no other feedbacks operating is 1 / (1 + [ -1]), where [κ -1] is the ‘uniform temperature’ radiative cooling response (of value approximately -3.2 W m-2 °C-1; Bony et al., 2006). If n independent feedbacks operate, [b] is replaced by (λ1 + λ 2+ … λ n).” (IPCC, 2007: ch.8, footnote)  Read rest...

Send to friend

Users' Comments  
 

Average user rating

 

Display 1 of 1 comments

1. Apr 17, 2008, 10:19 AM E.S.T.

...
This article deliberately distorts the available temperature data to get the bias the author wants. See this analysis for details.
Jürgen Hubert

Display 1 of 1 comments

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.9 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
< Prev   Next >

Need to log in? Not registered?