| on Apr 8, 2008, 05:00 PM E.S.T.
|
A few months have passed since our last hurricane update, and sure
enough, two more interesting articles have appeared recently in leading
scientific journals. Despite a relative calm over the past few years on
the hurricane front, the global warming crowd continues to insist on
thousands of websites that hurricanes are becoming more frequent and
intense due to the ongoing buildup of greenhouse gases. Their claims
are looking more silly every day, but they fully understand that some
other Katrina-like disaster is always in our future, so they seem to be
patiently waiting for the next major photo opportunity.
The first of the recent articles was published in the Journal of Climate by
William Briggs who unlike virtually everyone else we feature does not
seem affiliated with any recognizable research institution (he is
William Briggs, New York, New York). If he is working by himself
without the baggage that comes along with any research group, we
applaud the effort. Furthermore, the Journal of Climate is
published by the American Meteorological Society, and authors are held
to very high standards of scientific scrutiny – we congratulate him for
the effort.
Briggs reviews the recent literature on the subject of changing
hurricane activity in recent decades focusing on the highly celebrated
results of Emanuel suggesting that hurricanes in the North Atlantic
have become more destructive in the past 30 years. Briggs notes that
others “criticized the data analysis method used to demonstrate that
the index was increasing by pointing out that the smoothing method used
on the raw time series data was slightly flawed, that errors in the
observations should lead to a less certain statement about increases,
and that the wind speed adjustments used by Emanuel were too
aggressive.”
Briggs collected popular and widely-used hurricane data for the
North Atlantic and applied advanced (Bayesian) statistical methods to
the analyses of trends in the data. Briggs reports “The conclusion to
be drawn here is that there is good evidence that the number of
tropical cyclones has increased, but only if one chooses the right date
at which to start one’s analysis. Using start dates before around 1975
but after 1966 shows that there has been a definite linear increase.
But using any start date from 1966 to about 1974 shows no increase. The
rate at which hurricanes evolved from storms does not appear as
sensitive to the start date in the data, and there is some evidence
that this rate has decreased since at least 1966.” Briggs presents the
box plots (Figure 1) for the log of storm number, track length, and
power dissipation index, and concludes “There is no apparent trend.” Read rest...
|