Media Manipulation Gore Urges Scientist to Change Science to Suit His Alarmist Agenda
| 04 November 2009
IMAGINE a scientist came up with a way of solving "Global Warming" without ending the use of fossil fuels and other measures which threaten to destroy the US economy.
One would think that Al Gore and his research team would be delighted and would be pushing the scientist's findings to a wider audience.
But buried in a recent Newsweek story is an example of how Gore's team tried to change some Inconvenient Science to suit their agenda.
According to Timothy LaSalle, who Gore consulted for solutions to Global Warming, we could solve the "problem" of CO2 emissions by clever use of agriculture and technology. the response of Gore's team was to try and change his science.
The Newsweek article states:
"If we feed the biology and manage grasslands appropriately, we could sequester as much carbon as we emit," says Timothy LaSalle, CEO of the Rodale Institute, who presented at two summits. The political clash is this: if you tell people soils can be managed to suck up lots of our carbon emissions, it sounds like a get-out-of-jail-free card, and could decrease what little enthusiasm there is for reducing those emissions—as one of Gore's assistants told LaSalle in asking him to dial down his estimate. (He didn't.)
This is an outrageous interference in science for a political purpose. But what is the political purpose? Al Gore has called for stopping the use of fossil fuels and the complete restructuring of the economy in the US within ten years but when offered a chance to remove "harmful" CO2 from the atmosphere his team tries to change the science.
Could it be that Mr Gore and his team want the US economy and its free market system to be overturned regardless of the science? Could it be that they do not want to know about any science that does not allow them to tax and interfere in the lives of every American?
We heard a lot in the media about the Bush administration apparently rewriting science for political reasons. Will the media now highlight Al Gore doing exactly the same?
Comments
This "thinking man" was a flunk out at Divinity school and a D+ student anywhere his dad could (buy) his son's way into college.
Con artists like Roger Revelle (who recanted his earlier views about CO2 virtually upon his death bed) made such an impresssion on Gore that it gave Gore a reason to want to construct a world government (with Gore, by fiat, the wealthiest man in the new Utopia).
The world has been paying the price of acknowledgement of this doofus, the whole scenario has been a (bad) nightmare
If not, then there is no reason to 'cap and trade' other than to support Al Gore's British Hedge Fund and make him the first "Carbaon Billionaire" ....the new robber baron ot the 21st Century.
Dyson:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTSxubKfTBU
Why aren't these real issues being dealt with in the same vigorous manner as the moot "CO2 is causing climate change"? Because Al Gore is a just a con man with an Apple (computer).
REAL ISSUES
industrial pollution that's killing and maiming humans -
www.greenfootsteps.com/.../
cbsnews.com/.../...
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28352583/
www.infoplease.com/ce6/sci/A0861889.html
industrial greed starving humans -
permaculture.org.au/.../pay-monsanto-or-starve
stuffedandstarved.org/drupal/node/515
current.com/.../...
abcnews.go.com/print?id=4628103
endangered humans are an endangered species
findarticles.com/.../ai_104971401
accessmylibrary.com/.../...
www.foreignpolicy.com/.../geisler.pdf
www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-85615710.html
Beyond that, he is a liar and a scam artist who's made many millions spreading the hoax of "human emissions of fossil fuel CO2 are causing catastrophic global warming!"
And Newsweek dutifully perpetuates the scam.
If you haven't seen it yet, every "thinking man" must see Dr. Richard S. Lindzen's recent video. A link to his YouTube video and the downloadable companion slides in pdf format are prominent at the top of www.webcommentary.com/climate/climate.php
RSS feed for comments to this post.